探索AI实践论
《毛泽东选集》第一卷里的《实践论》中提到了在变革自然与变革社会的实践中认识与改造的过程。AI带来的社会和商业变革中同样存在着类似的认识与改造过程。
在认识的过程中,文中提到了两个阶段,分别是感性认识和理性认识。AI发展至今,其用户大部分还处在感性认识这一阶段。这个阶段的认识,主要依赖直接或间接经验。个人觉得,在B2C领域,用户的感性认识已经相对成熟,尤其是在日常生活、工作和编程中使用AI工具这一方面。相反,在B2B领域,用户的感性认识还相对缺乏。很多B2B用户会受到自己所使用的B2C工具的经验的影响。
然而,许多AI开发者以及开发AI工具的公司,已经完成了从感性认识到理性认识的转换,也就是从经验中总结出理论。甚至很多开发者已经可以把这些理论用于改造自己的产品。
“然而对于过程的推移而言,人们的认识运动是没有完成的。……革命时期情况的变化是很急速的,如果革命党人的认识不能随之而急速变化,就不能引导革命走向胜利。”同样的描述也可以用于现在的AI革命。AI革命队伍中的“顽固派,他们的思想不能随变化了的客观情况而前进”。就像有不少软件工程师,他们不愿意承认AI工具在改变他们的工作方式,只认为AI只是一个普通工具。
与此同时,也存在“空谈主义。他们的思想超过客观过程的一定发展阶段,有些把幻想看做真理。”不过我们也要小心区分空谈主义者的幻想与开拓者的愿景。前者的言论往往脱离实际,就像空中楼阁。而开拓者的愿景往往基于他们现有的知识和经验,在某些假设和前提下是可实现的。
如今“世界到了全人类都自觉地改造自己和改造世界的时候,”有一些“反对改造的人们”,他们也无法阻止自己“被改造”。科技的发展本身是不可阻挡的,就像天要下雨一样。不可否认,AI的影响可能要比工业革命来得更深远。AI不仅可以取代一部分体力劳动,也可以取代一部分脑力劳动。律师、工程师、作家、设计师、分析师等中产乃至精英阶层,都有可能受到影响。不可避免地,顽固派和卢德主义者会随之出现。
《实践论》很好地指出了AI革命在未来十年的实践过程:“通过实践而发现真理,又通过实践而证实真理和发展真理。从感性认识而能动地发展到理性认识,又从理性认识而能动地指导革命实践,改造主观世界和客观世界。”
In Volume I of Selected Works of Mao Zedong, On Practice describes the process of knowing and transforming through the practice of changing nature and changing society. A similar process of knowing and transforming is unfolding in the social and commercial changes brought by AI.
In the process of knowing, the text describes two stages: perceptual knowledge and rational knowledge. As AI has developed to where it is today, most of its users remain at the stage of perceptual knowledge. Knowledge at this stage depends mainly on direct or indirect experience. In my view, in the B2C domain, users' perceptual knowledge has become relatively mature, especially when it comes to using AI tools in daily life, work, and programming. In the B2B domain, by contrast, perceptual knowledge is still relatively lacking. Many B2B users are influenced by their experience with the B2C tools they use.
Many AI developers and companies building AI tools, however, have already made the transition from perceptual to rational knowledge—that is, from experience to theory. Many developers can now apply those theories to reshape their own products.
"Yet with respect to the course of development, the movement of human knowledge is not complete. ... During a revolutionary period, circumstances change very rapidly; if the knowledge of revolutionaries cannot keep pace with these rapid changes, they cannot lead the revolution to victory." The same description can also be applied to today's AI revolution. Within the ranks of the AI revolution, there are "die-hards, whose thinking cannot advance with changing objective conditions." For example, there are many software engineers who are unwilling to admit that AI tools are changing the way they work, and who see AI as just an ordinary tool.
At the same time, there is also "empty talk. Their thinking runs ahead of a given stage of development of the objective process, and some treat fantasy as truth." But we should also be careful to distinguish the fantasies of empty talkers from the visions of pioneers. The former are often detached from reality, like castles in the air. The latter are often based on their existing knowledge and experience, and can be realized under certain assumptions and premises.
Today, "the world has reached an era in which all of humanity consciously transforms itself and transforms the world." There are still "people who oppose transformation," but they cannot stop themselves from "being transformed." The development of technology itself is unstoppable, like rain that is bound to fall. Undeniably, AI's impact may be even more far-reaching than that of the Industrial Revolution. AI can replace not only some physical labor, but also some mental labor. Lawyers, engineers, writers, designers, analysts, and other middle-class or even elite professionals may all be affected. Inevitably, die-hards and Luddites will emerge.
On Practice points clearly to the practical process of the AI revolution over the next decade: "Discover truth through practice, and verify and develop truth through practice again. From perceptual knowledge, actively develop rational knowledge; and from rational knowledge, actively guide revolutionary practice to transform both the subjective and objective worlds."